Great read! While I'm only a space enthusiast and not a scientist, the very fact that the people with the most to gain by even hinting that the Moon landings were fake, the Russians, never attempted to do is the strongest evidence against the whole Moon Hoax Theory, which is 100% American born of post-Vietnam and Watergate cynicism.
The problem lies in failing to understand the full, dark, depths of the minds and reasons for creating these lies and misdirection. Flat earthers are naught but an obvious ruse to add unadulterated BS to the mix of lies we are being sold that bring truths into question as well. The moon landing hoax is different. Who is asking cui bono? Who benefits from the flat earth lie? Those creating the doubts and confusion that blends the truth with the lies, making these almost indistinguishable to the teeming masses. Who received real benefits benefits from the moon landing hoax? The military and weapons makers.
One of the problems people have with the idea of a "faked" moon landing is “why?” Why would the government fake a moon landing in the first place? To understand this, one must ask the question, "Cui Bono," who benefits?
Those old enough, remember the "cold war" that began immediately after WWII. They well remember how virtually weeks after the war, our staunch Soviet ally suddenly became America's intractable enemy. But few questioned how that happened. Fewer still asked why.
After the war, a tremendous amount of advanced, German weapons technology was stolen and exported to America and the Soviet Union. Nuclear submarine technology was an outgrowth of the German Type XXI U-boat design; a design copied virtually intact by the Soviets and kept in active service through the mid-1970s. The “cold war” was a war that enabled antagonistic countries to justify continued, peacetime development of advanced weapons technology at wartime production levels.
However, by the early to mid-sixties, a time when America was sending grain shipments to prop up the Soviet Union's disastrous agricultural plans, people had grown tried of
"duck-and-cover drills and trying to build bomb shelters in their basements and backyards. Hence, popular support for the fast advancing development of high-tech weapons, especially missile technology began to seriously lag by the beginning of the 1960s. Enthusiasm for the "cold war" was fast fading and the war and nuclear weapons mongers felt something was needed to spur continued public support for advanced weapons technology.
The "space race" was ingeniously conceived to enable advanced weapons development to continue as it did under the “cold war,” only now the “enemy” would be portrayed as a more or less friendly competitor in a race to "outer space" and then to the moon. The design was based on the American model of sporting events. Russia kicked off this murderous political game of weapons advancement with the much ballyhooed launch of “Sputnik.” Suddenly space missions were pretty much all the news heads were talking about. It wasn’t long before each launch was tracked as if it was game point for one side or the other.
But to really get the program going, the target had to be big, really big. Today it was ring-around-the-earth, tomorrow it would be the moon! As Jackie Gleason would say in those days, "One of the days Alice . . . to the moon Alice! To the moon!" Note that each launch was facilitated by nuclear missile weapons technology, furthering development and testing of the ICBM missile systems.
It wasn’t long before the US AIR FORCE logos on the sides of the missile boosters disappeared as the Air Force's role in the space race took a quiet back seat to NASA, an outgrowth of NACA, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Note that while NACA was an “advisory agency,” NASA was a bureaucratic administration.
The beginning of the 1970s ended the moon program. By then it was obvious that ICBM missile and nuclear warhead technology had reached its apogee, being quietly superseded by the perfection of the nuclear submarine and its multiple warhead, launch vehicles. A few decades later, the two legs of Strategic Air Command’s part in the so-called “nuclear triad” were suddenly disbanded and dissolved. ICBM boosters and bombers were no longer required to deliver nuclear warheads.
The "space race" was no longer needed either, so moon flights were quickly terminated, with no explanation. These were then eventually replaced by low profile, low orbit missions. Suddenly everyone forgot about going to the moon as Vietnam and Richard Nixon replaced the “space race,” to become the media’s latest rage.
It is interesting that, as manned space based weapons systems and platforms came under development, completely hidden of course from public view, the NASA space program was revived to enjoy a brief reemergence as the space shuttle program. But as computer technology continued to evolve along with A.I., that program also fizzled when it was determined expensive, manned, space-based weapons systems were unnecessary. Yet the program was was still kept on the back burner.
Today, the government does little more than pay the space program lip service and all those massive NASA complexes in Texas and Florida are little more than forgotten archaeological curiosities.
So who might benefit from a staged moon landing? The war and weapons mongers. And who is it that has the American economy funding these programs, under their full control? Those unable to identify the people and lies continuing behind the war and weapons mongering, are hopeless cases indeed.
Note, although the above was written over ten years ago, the premise is still valid. So who now benefits from the Artemis II program and the revival of a moon landing project? Perhaps more important is the question of why this would happen during a major conflict with Iran, history's first missile war no less. America is at now war at the behest of its Israeli ally. Therefore, it is instructive to note the Israeli Mossad's motto: "By way of deception thou shalt do war."
Great essay, Lucas ! Keep doing what you are doing. Everyone on the "Woke Right " should start looking at your work and paying attention.
It's 2026, FFS! Get up with the times, ppl.
The invisible man you heard about in your holly books does not exist.
You know what DOES exist ? Science!
Great read! While I'm only a space enthusiast and not a scientist, the very fact that the people with the most to gain by even hinting that the Moon landings were fake, the Russians, never attempted to do is the strongest evidence against the whole Moon Hoax Theory, which is 100% American born of post-Vietnam and Watergate cynicism.
The problem lies in failing to understand the full, dark, depths of the minds and reasons for creating these lies and misdirection. Flat earthers are naught but an obvious ruse to add unadulterated BS to the mix of lies we are being sold that bring truths into question as well. The moon landing hoax is different. Who is asking cui bono? Who benefits from the flat earth lie? Those creating the doubts and confusion that blends the truth with the lies, making these almost indistinguishable to the teeming masses. Who received real benefits benefits from the moon landing hoax? The military and weapons makers.
One of the problems people have with the idea of a "faked" moon landing is “why?” Why would the government fake a moon landing in the first place? To understand this, one must ask the question, "Cui Bono," who benefits?
Those old enough, remember the "cold war" that began immediately after WWII. They well remember how virtually weeks after the war, our staunch Soviet ally suddenly became America's intractable enemy. But few questioned how that happened. Fewer still asked why.
After the war, a tremendous amount of advanced, German weapons technology was stolen and exported to America and the Soviet Union. Nuclear submarine technology was an outgrowth of the German Type XXI U-boat design; a design copied virtually intact by the Soviets and kept in active service through the mid-1970s. The “cold war” was a war that enabled antagonistic countries to justify continued, peacetime development of advanced weapons technology at wartime production levels.
However, by the early to mid-sixties, a time when America was sending grain shipments to prop up the Soviet Union's disastrous agricultural plans, people had grown tried of
"duck-and-cover drills and trying to build bomb shelters in their basements and backyards. Hence, popular support for the fast advancing development of high-tech weapons, especially missile technology began to seriously lag by the beginning of the 1960s. Enthusiasm for the "cold war" was fast fading and the war and nuclear weapons mongers felt something was needed to spur continued public support for advanced weapons technology.
The "space race" was ingeniously conceived to enable advanced weapons development to continue as it did under the “cold war,” only now the “enemy” would be portrayed as a more or less friendly competitor in a race to "outer space" and then to the moon. The design was based on the American model of sporting events. Russia kicked off this murderous political game of weapons advancement with the much ballyhooed launch of “Sputnik.” Suddenly space missions were pretty much all the news heads were talking about. It wasn’t long before each launch was tracked as if it was game point for one side or the other.
But to really get the program going, the target had to be big, really big. Today it was ring-around-the-earth, tomorrow it would be the moon! As Jackie Gleason would say in those days, "One of the days Alice . . . to the moon Alice! To the moon!" Note that each launch was facilitated by nuclear missile weapons technology, furthering development and testing of the ICBM missile systems.
It wasn’t long before the US AIR FORCE logos on the sides of the missile boosters disappeared as the Air Force's role in the space race took a quiet back seat to NASA, an outgrowth of NACA, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Note that while NACA was an “advisory agency,” NASA was a bureaucratic administration.
The beginning of the 1970s ended the moon program. By then it was obvious that ICBM missile and nuclear warhead technology had reached its apogee, being quietly superseded by the perfection of the nuclear submarine and its multiple warhead, launch vehicles. A few decades later, the two legs of Strategic Air Command’s part in the so-called “nuclear triad” were suddenly disbanded and dissolved. ICBM boosters and bombers were no longer required to deliver nuclear warheads.
The "space race" was no longer needed either, so moon flights were quickly terminated, with no explanation. These were then eventually replaced by low profile, low orbit missions. Suddenly everyone forgot about going to the moon as Vietnam and Richard Nixon replaced the “space race,” to become the media’s latest rage.
It is interesting that, as manned space based weapons systems and platforms came under development, completely hidden of course from public view, the NASA space program was revived to enjoy a brief reemergence as the space shuttle program. But as computer technology continued to evolve along with A.I., that program also fizzled when it was determined expensive, manned, space-based weapons systems were unnecessary. Yet the program was was still kept on the back burner.
Today, the government does little more than pay the space program lip service and all those massive NASA complexes in Texas and Florida are little more than forgotten archaeological curiosities.
So who might benefit from a staged moon landing? The war and weapons mongers. And who is it that has the American economy funding these programs, under their full control? Those unable to identify the people and lies continuing behind the war and weapons mongering, are hopeless cases indeed.
Note, although the above was written over ten years ago, the premise is still valid. So who now benefits from the Artemis II program and the revival of a moon landing project? Perhaps more important is the question of why this would happen during a major conflict with Iran, history's first missile war no less. America is at now war at the behest of its Israeli ally. Therefore, it is instructive to note the Israeli Mossad's motto: "By way of deception thou shalt do war."